Yoon S, Ji WB, Um JW, Hong KD. Optimizing radiofrequency ablation parameters for perianal fistula treatment: A porcine model study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(5): 119504 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.119504]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We have reviewed the bibliographic information and the published manuscript, and we confirm that they are accurate. We are satisfied with the credibility, transparency, and publication quality of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.
The peer-review process was fair, objective, and constructive. The reviewers’ comments helped improve the clarity and overall quality of our manuscript, and the editorial communication was timely and professional.
We sincerely appreciate the efforts of the editors, reviewers, and production team. The entire publication process was well organized and professionally handled. We are pleased with the final published version of our manuscript and grateful for the opportunity to publish our work in the journal.